HUSSEIN Obama’s Collusion With Iran’s Mullahs: Kerry, The Bagman. Jarrett, The Point Woman! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Obama is the most despicable creature to grace the office of the Presidency of the United States. He should be tried and if found guilty be in front of a firing squad not in the White House. Most of his senior level administration past and present should be put on trial with him.


HUSSEIN Obama’s Collusion With Iran’s Mullahs: Kerry, The Bagman. Jarrett, The Point Woman! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

TYPICALLY, when one refers to a bagman, the conjured up images are that of a garden variety criminal. Yes and no.

IN reality, a bagman can be associated with all walks of life, just ask any team of prosecutors. Said criminal can be a courier for a drug cartel, as well as a white-collar banker/businessman type who launder money for any given financial crime. The point being, it just depends. Both are equally dangerous and guilty.

SO it is within this pendulum shift of criminal behavior – after all, treason IS a high crime and misdemeanor – which the actual details of HUSSEIN Obama’s anti-American tap dance with Iran’s mullahs are fully disclosed. However, on multiple occasions, the fact remains that this site revealed where its basis was headed: to a CALCULATED arming of Iran with nuclear weapons! No ifs, ands or buts. Atop it all, all of his related efforts are designed to anoint/appoint Iran as the regional hegemonic power. Incontestably. 

A veritable trail of breadcrumbs to said outcome can be found at various commentaries…seek, and you will find.


AS reported in Sept. 2013: the Islamist-in-Chief was jaw-jawing Iran to the WMD finish line. No doubt. Hence, its centrifuges spun (and continue to) on and on.


RESULTANT, was there any reason to believe that a nuclear armed Iran wouldn’t be a reasonable foregone conclusion?


THEREBY, it was asserted in Oct. 2013: Iran’s triumph has been ensured by the leader of the free world. Indeed.


REGARDLESS, the question, as always, is: to what end? Well, America’s and Israel’s jugular are primary targets. Yes, they are. 


IN other words, the jig is up, and in Nov. 2013 it was asserted as such. Okay.


AND if there were more than 24 hours in a day there would be time to re-document all the breadcrumbs housed within this site. Nevertheless, the following must be highlighted: it has always been claimed within these pages – to a 100% certainty – that Valerie Jarrett was HUSSEIN Obama’s point woman and consigliere, Iran’s deal maker.

NOW, as to Kerry, suffice to state that he was the final bagman. He was chosen for his “patrician” stature, yet, most importantly, his close ties to the mullahs on a familial and ideological basis. Plain and simple.

IN this regard, few recognized exactly how Allah bent HUSSEIN Obama and surrogates have been (since he took office!) to arm the mullahs, even to the point of colluding with the Senate to re-write the Constitution! Here’s the proof:


IN juxtaposition to a runaway POTUS, Congress can hardly claim (patriotic) bragging rights, and that’s not an overblown assessment. And this truth brings us right back to the recent hullabaloo over the “veto-proof” (aka “hard bargain”) vote they supposedly boxed HUSSEIN Obama into, relative to Iran’s mullahs. Ahh….the watered down and leaky “Corker Bill”. In reality, if it stands as is, it will go down in history as their most craven appeasement to date. Here’s why….

YES, while the president has the authority to negotiate treaties – emphasis placed on negotiate – the Constitution demands that 2/3 of the senators agree. Indeed, this is the case because of the inherent danger to too much power accruing in one leader’s hands, even/especially if POTUS. Bulls eye. Stipulated, the Founders were more than prescient.

“Alexander Hamilton tells us” that joint possession of such power provides the greater prospect of success, he said.

Under the proposed legislation, Congress can review the president’s deal with the radical Islamists and can reject it with a 60-vote margin. But Obama then can veto it, and it would take a 67-vote total to overturn the veto.

“We’ve turned the treaty provision on its head,” Levin said. “Instead of requiring two-thirds of the senators present to approve, this bill explicitly” demands 67 votes to stop the president.

“You need 67 votes to override a presidential veto to undo what Obama’s done,” he said. “Now we need a supermajority to override the president rather than a supermajority where the president needs approval for a treaty.”

WITH the above in mind, let’s pull back the curtain. Hence, the smoke will clear. AT its stripped base, the Senate just rewrote the Constitution, despite their bloviating:

“The United States Senate just rewrote the treaty provision of the Constitution,” he exclaimed. “This may be over the heads of most commentators … but it’s not over my head, and it won’t be over yours.” …continue reading

STILL, there are certain breadcrumbs which only surface when all the trimmings are fully cemented. Such is the case with the gravest act of treason imaginable, no less, from the leader of the heretofore free world. Hanging-worthy!

Read more—>

_If you comment we reserve the right to use your comment in/as a post

Follow us Follow Boudicabpi on Twitter

This entry was posted in government, Islam, Obama, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s